Phylotastic: Difference between revisions

From Evolutionary Interoperability and Outreach
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 75: Line 75:
|-
|-
|  treestore || New release of CDAO ontology adopting OBO conventions || [http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/cdao.owl link to release] || NA || no || Jim   
|  treestore || New release of CDAO ontology adopting OBO conventions || [http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/cdao.owl link to release] || NA || no || Jim   
|-
|  treestore || RDF model and ontology for TNRS requests and results || [http://phylotastic.org/terms/tnrs.rdf link to release] || NA || no || Hilmar   
|  treestore || RDF model and ontology for TNRS requests and results || [http://phylotastic.org/terms/tnrs.rdf link to release] || NA || no || Hilmar   
|-
|-

Revision as of 10:40, 5 August 2012

Error creating thumbnail: Unable to save thumbnail to destination

Warning

The Hackathon took place at NESCent June 4 to 8. This wiki, which was used as a central resource for pre-hackathon planning, is in a state of flux. Some parts reflect pre-hackathon brainstorming and are out of date. Other parts reflect outcomes of the hackathon. Probably the best place to go to see the current state of things is http://www.phylotastic.org .

Where to go

This is the public page for the Phylotastic hackathon (as distinct from the Leadership Team's planning page). Participants self-assembled into task groups to work on pieces of the project. For now, the best place to go for up-to-the-minute information is the sub-group pages here:

In addition, there are separate pages developed during pre-hackathon planning. Some of this material may be out of date:

Projected tangible outcomes

The table below include tangible outcomes of the hackathon such as code repositories, live demos, specifications, and documentation.

Group Description Item (link) Documentation (link) NEAD responsible person
all manuscript (evol bioinfo?) draft ms NA no Arlin
all iEvoBio talk slides at slideshare NA yes Karen, Arlin
all promo (screencast) PhylotasticPromo NA no Rutger, Arlin
all swag - phylotastic t-shirts, anyone? PhyloT Vote for Phylotastic NA no Meg?
arch demo galaxy server live demo and code (github) base class and screencast no Rutger
arch demo topology server live demo and code on github README.pod no Rutger
arch extensions to phylomatic NA NA no Cam
arch prototype controller architecture in nodeJS github project [1] no Helena
arch prototype controller as Perl CGI script https://github.com/phylotastic/cgi README on github no Ben
arch report: a reference architecture for phylotastic services draft NA no Helena
branch demo service to annotate tree with dates http://datelife.org NA no Brian O.
branch iEvoBio lightning talk NA NA yes Brian O.
branch Publication a specialized journal NA no Brian O.
shiny demo for reconcile-tree use-case live demo NA no Christian Z.
shiny Mesquite-o-tastic demo module Java code on github screencast yes Arlin & Peter
shiny scripts to convert Goloboff tree from TNT dir with perl code POD within code yes Arlin
shiny 5 blogs about the event blogspot NA no Holly
shiny refinement of gene duplication inference algorithm implementation dir with Java code limited no Christian Z.
TNRS API specification API TNRS no Naim
TNRS NCBI implementation of the API github NCBI no Siavash
TNRS MSW2 implementation of the API github MSW3 no Siavash
TNRS Demonstration Demo TNRS no Naim
treestore New release of CDAO ontology adopting OBO conventions link to release NA no Jim
treestore RDF model and ontology for TNRS requests and results link to release NA no Hilmar
treestore Perl ingestor of Newick trees/TNRS connection github NA no Enrico
treestore PhyloWS REST wrapper around tree store live demo NA no Mark
NA NA NA NA no NA
NA NA NA NA no NA

Background

A problem faced in many areas of life sciences research, from community ecology to comparative genomics to biomedical genetics, is to put the data available for a set of species into a phylogenetic context, based on a "species tree". For all we know, scientists are facing this type of problem hundreds of times every day. The past decade of efforts to assemble a large "tree of life", a phylogeny for all species, have produced many "megatrees" or "supertrees", usually limited to a particular group of organisms such as fungi, mammals or plants. Most scientists don't know how to use such huge trees. Yet, it ought to be possible to address the scientific demand for species trees by taking the existing supertrees, pruning away unneeded parts, and grafting on (where possible) missing species.

An existing tool called "phylomatic" does precisely this: starting with a user-supplied list of species and a huge phylogenetic topology for plant families, it grafts the species onto the tree wherever it can match the family name, and it prunes away all the rest. This is just a topology, so users find ways to add branch lengths to the resulting tree. The result is that the user, so long as she is only interested in plants, can get a phylogeny for an arbitrary list of named species. Phylomatic rocks: its frequent use shows that big species trees are highly useful for applications in ecology, biodiversity, & trait analysis,when the interfaces that serve user needs— and the mega tree providing vast coverage— are available.

This suggests that if a more general tool can be built, it will be extraordinarily useful, especially if

  • it is an open standard that can be implemented in many ways
  • the back-end data store is populated with large phylogenies available for fungi, fish, mammals, butterflies, etc (not just plants)
  • the core functionality (name-matching, grafting & pruning) is modularized in open-source bioinfo toolboxes
  • methods for adding branch lengths are easier and more generalized
  • all of the above operations are wrapped up as web services that can be invoked from existing computing environments

If this were a web service, we could plug it into Mesquite, and users could load up their species-based character matrix, then get a tree for it. In fact, lets go back a step, to consider users with only a list of species, and no data to compare: consider an even more open-ended discovery environment, which we could implement in Galaxy or Taverna (given that this is all based on web services). The user starts with a list of species (or a higher taxon), and a request for some useful types of data that could be obtained by querying various available sources, e.g., whether it has a cyt oxidase sequence in GenBank, whether it is found in California, where is the nearest specimen, etc.

resources: software, references, tutorials, and other useful links

Add links to papers, websites, code, tutorials, etc that would help people get up to speed on any of the proposed tasks.

after the hackathon

Opportunities right after the hackathon to build on the phylotastic momentum

  • do a challenge project for Geneious, present it at iEvoBio
  • develop slide presentation to accompany PhylotasticiEvoBio abstract for iEvoBio 2012
  • do the iEvoBio challenge at iEvoBio
  • work on Galaxy integration at a workshop

Manuscript

Phylotastic Architecture

A draft design resulted from pre-hackathon planning. This was then completely overhauled and superseded by the results of the work of the architecture subgroup.